Categories
D Rating instagram

SpectSocial Instagram Growth Service Review

Our Grade – D+

A shadowy site that has hints of life but probably is a ripoff.

View our grading methodology.

At a Glance

SpectSocial is a new service shrouded in secrecy and painfully-obvious fake reviews. The pricing suggests that it is a human-touch growth service, but it’s highly likely that it’s a basic bot.

Business Analysis

ItemResult
Growth TypeUnknown
Quality of ServiceUnknown
Business Registry / LocationAuburn, Alabama
Traceable TeamThe owner’s name is “Chris” and the parent company is Bali Media, LLC, but there’s no records whatsoever.
Functioning PhoneNo
Longevity<1 year
Doesn’t Misuse IG BrandingTrue
Active BlogNo
External SitesNo
Dashboard / Account ManagementNo
Offsite TestimoniesTrustPilot is filled with fake reviews
Forthcoming About Password HandlingNot really

Pricing

SpectSocial has very expensive plans which intend to indicate that there are humans working on your account. I highly doubt that humans will be working on your account.

Even compared to category-leader Ampfluence, this is a pretty awful deal and I’d be shocked if people are actually paying for this.

Service Details

The Elite and Pro plans provide whatever you’d expect to see from a service costing 1/3 or 1/2 the price. It’s unclear what the value proposition is here.

It’s very likely that this is a one-man operation that just happened to be really late to the game.

Integrity & Reputation

The header of the website contains an “As Seen on MSNBC” banner. This type of thing should be illegal because it’s incredibly misleading. This company didn’t pop up on MSNBC the minute the owner created the website, but the banner has been there forever.

Next, Trust Pilot. The reviews look good, but then you realize that all the good ones are clustered around May 2019 and that they’re all generic. Some of them even reference being customers for “years.” That’s not possible.


Obviously paid shill reviews

See how all these reviews are clustered around the same dates using the same extremely-generic American names? And how they all reference the length of subscription? Shills!
Again, the website says it was created in 2019 and Wayback supports this too. Shill!
I doubt that, since the website itself says it started in 2019…

Conclusion

If a service that has barely been around for a year offering services at the same price point as Ampfluence was actually worthwhile, maybe you’d actually have seen them appear on MSNBC.

This space really doesn’t need new players, especially ones that lie on their website and deceive customers. However, if the owner submits proof of having more than 100 active customers, I will upgrade this rating to the C range!

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *